This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bergner, R. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Status Dynamic Treatment of a Case of Bulimia

Illinois State University, rmbergn{at}ilstu.edu

According to Marshall (1993), bulimic individuals often emerge from families where the methods of parental governance are characterized by excessive coerciveness, disregard for who the child actually is, and insistence on conformity to an a priori template of how the child should be. Later, these methods are adopted by the child in her attempts to control her own behavior. Bulimic binge eating represents a rebellious reaction against these coercive and self-disregarding methods of familial and self governance. Bulimic purging represents a reinstatement of the coercive regime and sets the stage for further rebellion in the future. A critical practical implication of this formulation is that therapeutic emphasis should be placed on changing the self-governance strategies of bulimic individuals. A clinical case is presented in which such a focus resulted in a highly favorable outcome.

Key Words: bulimia • self-governance • paradoxical injunction • Descriptive Psychology

Clinical Case Studies, Vol. 4, No. 3, 295-303 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534650103259711


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?