Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Clinical Case Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Turkal, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Challenge of Extended, Continuous Collaboration

From Stress Management to Coping With Terminal Illness

Dennis J. Butler

Medical College of Wisconsin Columbia-St. Mary’s Family Practice Program, Milwaukee, dbutler{at}mcw.edu

Nick W. Turkal

University of Wisconsin Medical School Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee

Most collaborative relationships between psychologists and physicians are of a time-limited, episodic nature because they focus on specific clinical problems. This article describes a longitudinal clinical collaboration that transcended the traditional model because of shifting clinical needs over a continuous, extended period. The collaboration progressed through phases, and because the purpose of treatment changed, it was necessary for the collaborating clinicians to redefine goals, responsibilities, and boundaries. At times, the focus was on medical developments, and at times, treatment was primarily psychological. What began as a routine consultation about stress management developed into a complex collaborative approach that required a biopsychosocial orientation. This article delineates the phases of treatment and identifies factors that facilitated, challenged, and created dilemmas in the collaborative process.

Key Words: collaborative care • terminal illness • end-of-life care • acute stress • disorder • adenocarcinoma

Clinical Case Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 173-188 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1534650103259765


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?